Capitalist Eric

Truth is treason in an empire of lies.

The ONE Mitigating Circumstance…

with 33 comments

[This is a long post, on something I’ve been kicking around in my head for quite some time…  so please bear with me.  If nothing else, pull up the chair, pour a glass of wine, and I’ll hopefully give you some useful food for thought.]

“There are no ‘mitigating circumstances’ when it comes to rebellion against a liege lord.” Yoshi Toranaga

“Unless you win.” John Blackthorne

–James Clavell, SHOGUN

It is an interesting thing, to listen to activists on the left and right sides of the political aisle, to denigrate each other, and it is especially entertaining if you identify with either party against “them.”  But the sad reality between the political parties is best summarized in the following:

“There is not a dime’s worth of difference between the Democrat and Republican Parties!” Alabama Governor George Wallace, candidate for President, 1968

An objective look at the track-record of the last 45 years (since that observation was made), will demonstrate that both parties aren’t interested in the welfare of the American people, but looking out for the welfare of their own pocketbooks.  The country is now run by two battling factions, the globalists and collectivists.

The globalists are interested in money and power.  They aim to accomplish the dream of past tyrants like Napoleon, Hitler, Lenin and Stalin: world domination.  Their fiat-currency schemes have crippled every economy around the world- save Iceland, ironically- and utterly destroyed the sovereignty of every single nation on the planet.  The financial whiz-kids of the American financial system, in cahoots with their British counterparts, have created an economic virus which has infected every corner of the globe.  The purpose of this virus is to bring the global economy to its knees at the same time, so that power can be consolidated, and a centralized bank for the entire world unveiled as the savior to all our financial problems.  But of course, a global bank will no more save us than the Federal Reserve has saved us, but that should be obvious.

The fly in the ointment of their globalist plans, has been the United States of America, which has been an economic powerhouse, due to manufacturing know-how, ingenuity, strong property rights and an economic system that fosters innovation.  As an added bonus, those same unruly Americans are armed to the teeth.  How does one bring down such a large stumbling-block to the well-laid globalist plans?

Corrupt their country, of course.  This has been done by corrupting the staunch property rights by eroding the rule of law, the work ethic of Americans in the schools, corrupting the parent-child relationship, and making the international trading laws such that the economy of the USA can be hollowed-out.  To further corrupt Americans, turn every possible group one against the next (think of hyphen use in how you identify yourself, while I am simply “American”), pit the poor against the rich, pit the right against the left, and militarize the police so that people are afraid to speak up, to stand for what’s right.

Finally, since the globalists ARE the banksters and use the Federal Reserve- as well as the European Central Bank- to work in conjunction with other countries, they will continue to devalue the currencies until they’ve reached their intrinsic value, which is (in the case of a dollar bill) merely a scrap of paper.  As a hidden bonus, let’s make it difficult to use physical currency or obtain precious-metals, and make all transactions digital (including new money “printing”), so when the collapse occurs, your dollar isn’t even worth the paper it’s NOT printed on…  Merely erase the files, and voila’!  No money, because it never existed to begin with.

It’s truly diabolical, what they’ve done.  Their end-goal remains the same, though…  money and power.  If THEY control all money, in the end, only they will HAVE money, and therefore all the POWER.  Their actions- as manifested by the Federal Reserve and ECB, the “template” of Cyprus which they will use globally to steal anything they’ve not already stolen, shows they have no compunctions with such minor things as ethics and morals.  These people are amoral in nature; that is, they don’t care about what is or is not moral, because such things don’t matter.  ALL that matters to them, is power.  Total power isn’t just a goal, it’s the only goal, and only amoral people would ever desire such a thing.  So whether it’s right or wrong to murder someone, starve an entire country to death (as Cyprus was threatened with), or genocide…?  The ends justifies the means.   This is the summary of the globalists and what they’re doing.

On the flip side of the coin, are the collectivists.  Some are “democrats,” some are hardcore liberals, some socialists or communists, and so on…  Of course, others are masquerading as “Republicans,” or whatever they need, to seem as an alternative to the leftist ideologues.  But with a few rare exceptions, they’re all the same; playing a game, to pad their wallets.  True representatives of the people are avoided as much as possible; witness the “Republican” party bank-rolling easily-controlled puppets, and vilifying anyone who might not toe the party-line (such as “Comprehensive Immigration Reform”).  The Republican and Democrat parties are a sweet-heart deal, because while they’re completely controlled, the illusion of “choice” remains…

But as has been demonstrated under every President since at least Ronald Reagan (and the case could easily be made all the way back to Eisenhower), every administration has been in the pocket of the big banks and the big military contractors.  Each administration simply does what it must, to fulfill their agendas, while doing what’s necessary to line their own pockets at the same time.  This is why legalized insider-trading was just signed into law by Obama, after receiving overwhelming support in the House and Senate.  Everyone’s on the take, and NOBODY is representing the people…

The collectivists of the left-leaning variety, push the police-state agenda.  They dearly want to quash any sense of individualism, profit, capitalism, representative government, and so on.  In other words, they’re your typical communist activists, struggling to develop their idealistic view where everyone is equal, everyone gets the same pay, nobody stands out, nobody profits.  That this system has utterly failed every time it has been tried, they think is only because they weren’t running the show.  A lot of them honestly believe this, and believe that with the right government controls, they can stamp out poverty, inequality, famine, disease, and all the other vagaries of existence.  They mean  well, in that they think that government can overcome the nature of man, and they think that with enough wishful thinking, enough emotion and enough conversation, they can convince everyone else that their beliefs are true…

To accomplish the utopian goal of universal equality, there are certain things that need to happen, to erode the individuality and make such a system possible.  At this website, the 10 Planks of Marxism are listed, with our modern American equivalent (additional comment are from the linked website):

1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.

Americans do these with actions such as the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management (Zoning laws are the first step to government property ownership)

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

Americans know this as misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State “income” taxes. We call it “paying your fair share”.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

Americans call it Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

Americans call it government seizures, tax liens, Public “law” 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of “terrorists” and those who speak out or write against the “government” (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process. Asset forfeiture laws are used by DEA, IRS, ATF etc…).

5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.

Americans call it the Federal Reserve which is a privately-owned credit/debt system allowed by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) another privately-owned corporation. The Federal Reserve Banks issue Fiat Paper Money and practice economically destructive fractional reserve banking.

6. Centralization of the means of communications and transportation in the hands of the State.

Americans call it the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Transportation (DOT) mandated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and Executive orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver’s licenses and Department of Transportation regulations.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

Americans call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture… Thus read “controlled or subsidized” rather than “owned”… This is easily seen in these as well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.

8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

Americans call it Minimum Wage and slave labor like dealing with our Most Favored Nation trade partner; i.e. Communist China. We see it in practice via the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two “income” family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920’s, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries, gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of population over the country.

Americans call it the Planning Reorganization act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public “law” 89-136. These provide for forced relocations and forced sterilization programs, like in China.

10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production.

Americans are being taxed to support what we call ‘public’ schools, but are actually “government force-tax-funded schools ” Even private schools are government regulated. The purpose is to train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based “Education” . These are used so that all children can be indoctrinated and inculcated with the government propaganda, like “majority rules”, and “pay your fair share”. WHERE are the words “fair share” in the Constitution, Bill of Rights or the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26)?? NO WHERE is “fair share” even suggested !! The philosophical concept of “fair share” comes from the Communist maxim, “From each according to their ability, to each according to their need! This concept is pure socialism. … America was made the greatest society by its private initiative WORK ETHIC … Teaching ourselves and others how to “fish” to be self sufficient and produce plenty of EXTRA commodities to if so desired could be shared with others who might be “needy”… Americans have always voluntarily been the MOST generous and charitable society on the planet.

Do you notice how many of the 10 Planks have been implemented?  The answer is, of course, ALL of them.

But much more interesting, is how most of them dovetail with the globalist agenda…  Which is why they were implemented so easily.  Basically, real Americans are fighting against not one, but two internal enemies, that are Hell-bent on destroying the U.S.A.

The leftist ideologues are pushing the agenda in their belief that the end result will be a world free of pain, hunger, worry, failure or success…  They believe in it so much, that they’re perfectly happy to commit treasonous acts against this country, because those “evil dead white guys” who wrote the Constitution were a bunch of twits, who didn’t give a damn about the “little guy.”  They think their viewpoint is the only one with a sense of compassion, and that anybody who doesn’t agree with the is truly evil and heartless.  So they’ll commit crimes, hurt or kill “heartless” people, to save the rest of humanity from the evils of capitalism.

Your opinion that God will judge them harshly, falls on deaf ears.  After all, the leftist utopians are (by and large) irreligious- at best, indifferent to religious tenets, if not downright hostile to such beliefs…  because adherence to such beliefs would compel one to act with a moral core.  And leftist ideologues believe- like the globalists- that the end truly justifies the means.  An example is the question of abortion; leftists believe that convenience and whatever they happen to believe at the time, is the truth.  If they decide to believe, on a whim, that a child is not really human until the age of three, than it becomes a logical extension to allow “abortions” until a child is aged three.  Yes, they really proposed this, as they claim that newborn babies are not “actual persons” and do not have a “moral right to life”.

THIS is proof positive that the leftists are irreligious, and amoral.

Your warnings that they will burn in Hell for the crimes they are committing, will fall on deaf ears, because they care only about THIS life, their power OVER you, and clearly, they have no qualms about murder of the most repugnant sort.  Do you think they’ll have any qualms about killing you, or your children?

This grotesque display of logic by the leftists, also serves as a clear indication of why every communist state has ultimately turned on itself, resulting in literally mountains of skulls.

But it is also the result of collectivism in all its forms: socialism, communism, fascism/corporatism and progressivism.

You’ve probably noticed I lump in the “Republicans” with the Democrats, socialists and communists, and perhaps you’ve disagreed with me on this point…  Before you get angry that I would use such a broad brush, I would ask you to read an absolutely brilliant essay, “The Political Spectrum Con,” written in 2005 by Nelson Hultberg.

While his explanation is beautiful, I will try to summarize it as follows:

1.  We’ve been taught the political spectrum is divided as shown:

However, the fallacies of this are that a.) Communism, Socialism and Fascism are all dictatorships, different only in the details, b.) there are shades of total governance, but nothing mentioned about the lack of governance (i.e., shades of freedom or anarchism), c.) socialism is good as long as it’s “democratic.”

He makes the point that other spectrums are used, such as how the economy works:

The entire distortion is a subtle attempt to make advo­cates of individualism and capitalism appear as extremists or fascists and convince everyone that the ideal system is our present centralized welfare state. This is certainly not a correct picture. The true political spectrum that properly portrays reality according to Aristotle’s doctrine of the mean would be as follows:



What this basically means, is that both the left AND the right are trying to consolidate power for their own ends.  The Republicans use it to line their own pockets and have an empire (based on military exploits) while the Democrats are using government to line their own pockets while mouthing the utopian platitudes.

We’ve delved into the no-mans’ land of total government control (remember George W. Bush signing the PATRIOT-USA act?), and whether you vote for the right or the left, you will NOT get your freedom back by merely voting on election day, because all of the “acceptable” candidates are pushing further and further left… on the above graph.

THIS is why nothing ever changes in Washington D.C., and only continues to get worse.

THIS is why our “representatives” claim monopoly power to use force, while we are literally being disarmed by our government.

Ex-president b.j. clinton once said “Terror mean[s] killing and robbery and coercion by people who do not have state authority and go beyond national borders.”

If the government wants to plant bombs at the Boston Marathon, it’s not terrorism, it’s state policy.  If the government commits false-flag attacks, to promote the increasing level of government control, it’s not a crime or terrorism, it’s merely “politics.”

Remember Melissa Harris-Perry, that “African-American” professor at Tulane, who claimed that your children belong to the state?  She bragged that she starts her political science class that when a criminal steals your money at gunpoint, we call that armed robbery; if the state does that, we call it “taxation.”

Yes, the leftists (as used on the last graph above) truly believe all of this…  stuff.

So now, we get to the heart of the matter…  We’ve been under attack from all sides, for the better part of 50 years…  by banksters, by government lackeys and hangers-on, by people in it for the money, crooks and thieves, swindlers, etc.  We’ve also been under attack by those who would presume to know what’s best for us, no matter what we really want or need.  And so, let’s take a look at where we stand, in this war being waged upon us:

  • We have no honest media, only propaganda outlets (talking about the MSM).
  • We’ve lost the schools, and we’ve almost lost our kids.
  • We have no justice system, and the governments are hopelessly corrupted with liars, cheats and whores.
  • We’ve no more property rights, no more rights at all (look at the thugs in Boston, for an example).
  • We’ve lost our economy, and our livelihoods, with little prospect of them returning any time soon.
  • The treasury has been emptied of gold, replaced with IOU’s that are worth nothing.
  • The retirement funds are empty; default on some $238 Trillion of actual debt is certain.

And NOW, they’re using jack-booted thugs (cops, DHS, TSA, to terrorize and intimidate any who dare express their anger.

The only thing we have left, is the “doomsday option” built into the Constitution: the 2nd Amendment.

We’ve lost everything else, but at least we still have our arms (unless they can somehow take those away).  And until they figure out how to make that happen, gun owners remain a very real threat to them.  If you can’t beat them on the battlefield, make them think you’re stronger than you are…  and that’s what they’re doing.

In my viewpoint, the only logical conclusion to the war that has been waged on us by the collectivists (from both the left and right) is revolution.  And I know, to even say such a thing, makes me a “potential terrorist.”  *Yawn.*  It’s common-sense.

The FedGov has made anyone who even thinks outside their approved narrative, a designated “potential terrorist,” for the intimidation factor.  If- by some strange chain of events- real Americans finally say “I’ve had enough,” it’s game over for the FedGov fools (and any more local people who’re trying to collect their own power).  The government tries to be everywhere at once, make a show of how tough  they are with their tacti-COOL gear, their MRAP armored cars (which can’t navigate off of roads) and their overwhelming numbers (like they did in Boston)…

It’s evil to talk about revolution.  It’s evil and dangerous to question your government.  And (according to the government) there are NO mitigating circumstances under which rebellion is acceptable…

Unless you win.

Please let me know your thoughts, on this…  I’m not a professional blogger, I just do this to hopefully put out useful information, and perhaps synthesize “the big picture” into something manageable, better understood, I guess you could say…  So I guess it’s my weird way of keeping my sanity, in an insane world.  If you have suggestions on what else I should study and write about, I’m open to your thoughts…  Capitalist Eric


Written by capitalisteric

May 20, 2013 at 6:34 am

Posted in Uncategorized

33 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. […] stuff from Capitalisteric, which […]

  2. A truly beautiful and articulate piece of work. Definitely brings clarity to the goings on in our country and the world. As in chess, they’re two steps ahead and leaving us all confused and wondering why. It explains why others can’t see it because of their normalcy bias. We all know in our heads what’s going on, but putting pen to paper (or html code to web) allows you to see the entire plan as it is laid out. Good job.


    May 20, 2013 at 1:33 pm

  3. […] While I may agree with the general direction of your diatribe, I believe some of your assertions leave a little to be desired.

    The reason why it is complex to understand not just the first and the Second Welfare theorem, is because consumers are a product of it and therefore will never see their fate, for example here is the research for policy on abortion, it is innocuous, mathematically perverse and puts people to sleep in an attempt to interpret it, so do consumers understand this ?


    And it goes on, but it describes well methods, methodology and practice. We need only the elective franchise to buy into it by fiscal coercion. And they have, they don't as a general rule understand value.

    Andren Essen

    May 20, 2013 at 1:38 pm

    • Initially, I approved your comment as it was. But… SOMETHING about your post kept sticking in my mind… and it took a while to catch on.

      If one assumes the validity of a “welfare theorem” or several of them, than one can logically calculate the “welfare” of an individual. Which leads to the lovely phrases by our President referring to everyone getting their “fair share.” This ONLY works if you accept the idea that welfare can be mathematically derived. The idea is absurd on its face.

      Even more importantly, is the underlying assumption that the government- or any man- has the power to decide appropriate welfare levels of any other man. When one rejects this, the mathematical study of such “theorems” becomes moot because the null-hypothesis applies.

      I give you credit for the level of originality in your post- VERY clever.


      May 20, 2013 at 6:12 pm

  4. I’ve always argued that fascism should be on the left with communism, glad to see that Aristotle agrees!

    I have never understood the difference between capitalism and anarcho-capitalism. It seems to me that capitalism is fairly libertarian and as such would not respect borders in any way, regarding the flow of goods or labor. It also seems like “crony-capitalism” is a natural result of pure capitalist competition.


    May 20, 2013 at 3:04 pm

    • Crony Capitalism can only flurish within a state system. In an Anarcho-Capitalist system there is no state to buy favors from. It is a pure free-market.

      Josh A. Kruschke

      May 21, 2013 at 12:28 am

  5. Couple of things. Firstly, a key element of Cultural Marxism is the destruction of any nationalistic cohesion amongst the majority. This was undertaken by the Marxist, Trudeau, in Canada when he came to power in the late 60’s and it has been remarkably successful. The main policy instrument to accomplish this, of course, is unbridled immigration from third world, brown nations with cultures totally different from ours, paying them generous welfare benefits, free education, affirmative action, etc., all at the expense of the founding culture. Then, they implement hate laws to prevent anyone from criticizing these policies.

    Since then, this has become the general policy of every nation in the West, and it is no coincidence – this has been coordinated by some supranational organization, such as the Trilateral Commission.

    Secondly, I believe we have seen the creation of a new, hybrid political and cultural orthodoxy. Socially and culturally, we have institutionalized Cultural Marxism as the governing method of social control, we economically we have formed a fascist, corporatist model and the large oligopolies in banking, health, communication, pharmaceuticals, etc., have become handmaidens of the state.


    May 20, 2013 at 4:12 pm

  6. The long and short of it is we are at war . Can’t find ammo anywhere in the USA . Aristotle said it best ” Fear is the anticipation of evil “a great evil is coming . We are a fearful nation, please prepare.


    May 20, 2013 at 6:08 pm

  7. I agree wholeheartedly.

    I would add the concept of “continuity of government” is proof positive of all of the above. The government doesn’t have a “right” to exist.
    The idea that it does flies in the face of the DoI: “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government.”

    The foundational document of the American Experience is the DoI not the constitution.

    As long as the Liberty movement is reverential of the constitution then we will get exactly what we deserve.


    May 20, 2013 at 6:18 pm

  8. Reblogged this on Cave of the Ice People.


    May 20, 2013 at 8:01 pm

  9. Keep in mind that wealth always gravitates toward power, never power toward wealth. And to paraphrase Mao, all power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Would-be tyrants don’t use wealth to gain power, they use power to gain wealth. With wealth comes control, but power always comes first. The only reason we accept fiat currency is because there’s a gun barrel backing it up. It’s “legal tender for all debts public and private,” and if you refuse to accept it and demand something else instead, sooner or later a man with a gun will come after you.

    Joseph P. Martino

    May 20, 2013 at 8:55 pm

    • Keep in mind that wealth always gravitates toward power, never power toward wealth.

      I think it unwise to state that as an absolute rule. The best response I could give is, “it depends.” On circumstances, the person, the society at the time, etc.

      Would-be tyrants don’t use wealth to gain power, they use power to gain wealth.

      It depends. To a tyrant who controls a country or an empire, what is the use of wealth, when one can have anything that they’re able to imagine? None of the most successful tyrants had much use for money- Lenin and Stalin, Mao, Pol-Pot, Castro, Kim Jong Il (or his whacked-out son), etc., would contradict your observation.

      The only reason we accept fiat currency is because there’s a gun barrel backing it up. It’s “legal tender for all debts public and private,” and if you refuse to accept it and demand something else instead, sooner or later a man with a gun will come after you.

      I agree wholeheartedly, on this point. While the fiat currency still carries the implication of some value, this will remain true. However, when it no longer has any value, that’s when things are going to get… “interesting.”

      Thanks for the comment.


      May 21, 2013 at 1:07 am

  10. Hang on. Before we rush to the closet to retrieve the AR, there is another, peaceful option that achieves the same means.
    And that is to follow Ann Barnhardt’s lead and withhold all federal income taxes. Lord knows the IRS has lost the right to collect from those who just want to do an honest day’s work.
    That would bring the system down in one year, without a single bullet fired.

    Let us not rush into a second civil war, which will make the French Revolution look pretty.

    Please, consider this alternative. They cannot build and staff prisons for all the productive class – who would fund them?


    May 20, 2013 at 11:27 pm

    • Ever heard of asset forfeiture? The answer to your question is, “You would – for the short term.” And then it won’t matter. The AR (or fear of millions of ARs) is going to be the answer. Strong and honest men will not be shoved around by stooges (local or federal officers) of criminal bureaucrats (IRS?), who are lackeys for their Betters. Your solution assumes we can all coordinate the great Withholding at the same time. If not (and it is nigh impossible), they get to win by making a thousand small cuts – taking people to jail and stealing their assets to pay for the trouble.

      Bruno Pezzey

      May 21, 2013 at 2:28 am

    • Taxes really only pay the interest on the FedGov debt. They will be able to secure the funding necessary to put you down like a dog in order to extract the amount they see as due them. The banksters will loan money to them on the condition that they use it to collect your taxes by taking your life along with your money, thereby cowing the rest into compliance. For a more extensive exploration of this, I would refer you to “No Treason” by Lysander Spooner.

      Jeff Anderson

      May 21, 2013 at 9:16 pm

  11. Reblogged this on showmethemoneytbone and commented:

    T Human

    May 21, 2013 at 2:46 am

  12. That’s what killing fields are for Orencian…. just sayin’


    May 21, 2013 at 3:02 am

  13. Too cowardly to post my original comments? Then way too cowardly to carry out a “second revolution”.

    So many Constitutional options available to we Americans, and are being successfully being implemented today, to think of taking up arms. If people can’t engage in these efforts, they will never possess the courage and understanding to engage in a real civil war, a physical struggle for Liberty.

    Stop kidding yourself, and others.


    May 21, 2013 at 3:51 am

    • Too cowardly to post my original comments? Then way too cowardly to carry out a “second revolution”.

      These ARE your original comments, genius. But hey, at least I approved them, even though you’re just another statist shill. You should be glad for that, yeah?

      So many Constitutional options available to we Americans, and are being successfully being implemented today, to think of taking up arms.

      Wow… We’ll start the lesson with a reading assignment. It’s by Claire Wolfe, called “Landmine Legislation in the 104th Congress,” written about 20 years ago…

      After you’ve read the article (and your comments will indicate whether you’ve read and absorbed the facts that Ms. Wolfe has made clear), then we can continue on with our discussion of what “Constitutional methods” are left…

      If that does not sit well with you, than be on your way; I’ve neither time nor patience to wake up a sheep who prefers to remain asleep.



      May 21, 2013 at 4:34 am

      • Like I said, full of BS, and absent of solutions. Whine and complain (but not one single resolution)…..sounds like woman’s work, nicely done.

        According to you, and Claire, surrender is the only real option, as defeat is already accepted.

        [I have deleted the rest of your comment. You’ve worn out your welcome, at least where I’m concerned.]


        May 21, 2013 at 1:12 pm

  14. Whites need to carve off a land of our own.

    Lt. Greyman, 1Br NVA

    May 21, 2013 at 5:54 am

    • Yep. When this all goes to sh t, we’ll need to have like-minded people living near each other to get through it.

      Mutant Swarm

      July 1, 2013 at 4:50 am

  15. Now bring it home: which came first, the Bankers or the Communists? The Bankers – they created and fund the Communist Movement, including its earlier incarnation as the French Revolution. Obviously a Revolution needs a lot of money and know how. Yet people seem to swallow Communist propaganda about workers doing it. Gary Allen said it decades ago and provided the image: the vise, crushing the middle class between the Elite and the Workers they have stirred up. Thus under Barack Obama, Neo Liberalism and Neo Conservatism have found their cap stone. He serves the Bankers.

    What is left? Only Fascism, the Third Way which is between and above both Capitalism and Communism. Capitalism and Communism are both economic philosophies which put things first. Fascism put man first and orders things to serve him. The old Czeck joke puts it well: Under Capitalism, man oppresses man. Under Communism it’s the other way around.


    May 21, 2013 at 6:40 am

  16. […] View full post on capitalisteric […]

  17. Great article. But your solution assumes we can coordinate this coast to coast revolution at the same time. Millions of weapons but no leadership; no national or regional organization. We are dispersed, divided and disunited as a country. THEY did their work well. Half the time we can’t agree on even the most minute of issue’s. What supply, training, logistics and funding are we to rely on? I assume your serious about this solution. I do appreciate the simplicity and clarity of the article. Thanks!


    May 22, 2013 at 11:12 pm

    • I don’t know that I’ve provided or assumed a “solution.” From a tactical perspective, there are plenty of other websites that ate *far* more qualified to delve into such questions… I’m simply not educated enough to present an opinion.

      However, from a strategic perspective, I have a few thoughts… and so I’ll take your suggestion and run with it.

      Thanks for the input!


      May 23, 2013 at 4:06 am

  18. Professor R.J. Rummels epic website on POWER KILLS, takes an analytical view of the STATE v PEOPLE paradigm. His analysis tracks historical world events concerning the effects of and methods in a sobering format, with lots of information drawn from multiple sources. I further comment that he does make a very good attempt to validate sources which can be tested so you may draw your own conclusions, i recommend it as good reading. I believe he does not track certain spheres of influence by what is called simple omission but that paucity of specific information speaks volumes as to a rule of not biting the hand that feeds you or ideologies in it’s all for greater good mission.

    The post industrial America that evolves is more about human efficiencies based on many controls through regulation by statute and policy. Some may say that it is communism, some may as I believe, call it Darwinian capitalism, but we are watching the behavior of humans doing what humans do best. That would be watching the parade and jumping on band wagons that offers the best option as opposed to a firm grounding in common sense, common law or common purpose. That idea left this debate last century with the newer politics of commerce and its self favoring determinations. There are other factors to consider which of those are the continued state of emergency that each state proclaims in it’s elective voting cycles in one form or another by their respective leadership. These take many forms but are the sustaining political platform by which statutory law has become the precedent for common sense, more particularly a different consensus that has nothing to do with the peoples interests, but only of the state.

    There are certainly many highly empowered groups both political and commercial in nature as a result of our form of politics which Huey Long describes in his Book ‘Every man a King’ quite eloquently. While he further if I recall correctly, stated something to the effect of that ‘because we call something a different thing it does not make it something else but we will think it is something else.’ Which leads us to the politically correct world of is an ass hole still an ass hole when we use a new word for one.

    Regardless, I subject others to review each states ‘Act of enablement’ as a means to secede to federal control from the original territories into franchised commity not citizenship. The terms are simple but highly deceptive in what the interpreted form of citizenship entails. In this respect we will see why we live in regulation as beneficiaries with granted privileges while in good standing or in terms of policy. We are also subjects of that policy by extension to a purposeful creation of that art form, which are attourners at law, not in law, there is a difference and there are millions of them. In fact if we do one thing well it is not only to outnumber the number of criminals in the world incarcerated, we outnumber the world in terms of psychiatrists, medical practitioners, educationalists, social workers, government employees, taxes, well almost everything. So do understand Attourners are not lawyers, they are statutory code processors. So when you have your ass handed to you by a politician or attorney it is because we do not understand the concept of policy and fees based rules under commity, instead we choose to look at that forlorn document that is archived under glass described by one of our leaders as a ‘Goddam piece of paper’ with some lack luster understanding.

    More importantly all that you own is considered fruit of their labor not yours, you are a beneficiary only, so pay up and move along or die. Whatever you choose nobody cares, but do keep that accusing finger pointing in the wrong direction. It is always the same in developing dog pile societies, while we are assured by simply observing the physics of shit rolling down hill, that we will kick those least able to defend themselves in the sandbox of the rung in which you find yourself on the ladder to personal nirvana. I raise concerns regarding the politically massaging of the doctrine which gives rise to National socialism, of which state sequestration of services is only part of a historically proven process. With an end game that is all too predictable are we really experiencing something that has not been experienced by others. Simply because someone calls it too big to fail, quantitative easing, policy directives validated from some study or other.

    Andren Essen

    May 23, 2013 at 6:59 am

  19. Eric, your analysis is accurate but you have misused the term “rule of law” rule of law is a communist process as originated and owned by Albert venn dicey, circa 1917. It is not associated with, nor ever has been a part of representative republics or constitutional law, it is the purest definition of communism. Albert was a buddy of Carl Marx and they both espoused the communist doctrine, which is, rule of law. The term you wanted to use was constitutional law. It is what defines the U.S. And separates us from the rest of the world. These days, you must source every buzz phrase to make sure it is used in the correct manner. Other communist terms currently being misused are “law fare” and “laws of war”. The only law of war is that the good guys go home at night, or leave the battle safe, the bad guys don’t. As an example, the government of Afghaniatan is a fully up, running, and approved, rule of law government. how many similarities are there with our government and the Afghan government are there, besides crooked politicians and special interest groups? -None!

    Source digger

    June 7, 2013 at 3:25 pm

  20. […] Reader B.B. sent this food for thought: Unless You Win […]

    Odds 'n Sods: |

    July 8, 2013 at 5:13 pm

  21. Well stated ! Enough is Enough !
    It’s PAST time to Restore our REPUBLIC.
    There’s NO achieving Restoration by any other means.
    The divide is too wide. The enemy is fully entrenched.
    They won’t walk quietly into the night.
    Restoration must be achieved the old fashion way …..
    As our founders did.
    GAME ON !


    September 1, 2013 at 10:53 pm

  22. A most excellent analysis and deserved of praise but I do offer

    Just a reminder that we are dealing with history and not suppositions or creative thinking in supplement to the above.

    Please do read

    for a slightly altered and legible version with supplements


    for an even more profound version we need to be looking further back to some profoundly disturbing propositions required of the American people to remain ignorant of them by design. How is it that we forget so easily. .

    Andren Essen

    February 28, 2014 at 10:22 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: